Dow Jones (INDU) Down $103 On 4 Hour Chart; Entered Today Up 0.85%

Dow Jones 4 Hour Price Update

Updated July 01, 2020 11:13 PM GMT (07:13 PM EST)

The choppiness in the recent four-hour candle price action of Dow Jones continues; to start the current 4 hour candle, it came in at a price of 25686 US dollars, down 0.4% (103) since the last 4 hour candle. Relative to other instruments in the 8 major global equity indices asset class, Dow Jones ranked 7th since the last 4 hour candle in terms of percentage price change.

Dow Jones Daily Price Recap

Dow Jones closed the day prior up 0.85% (217.08); this denotes the 2nd day in a row it has gone up. Out of the 8 instruments in the 8 major global equity indices asset class, Dow Jones ended up ranking 3rd for the day in terms of price change relative to the day prior. The daily price chart of Dow Jones below illustrates.

Dow Jones Technical Analysis

Volatility for Dow Jones has been contracting over the past two weeks relative to volatility over the past month. Whether volatility reverts will be something to watch. Or to view things another way, note that out of the past 30 days Dow Jones’s price has gone up 17 them.

Overheard on Twitter

For laughs, fights, or genuinely useful information, let’s see what the most popular tweets pertaining to Dow Jones for the past day were:

  • From PeterSchiff:

    The Dow Jones bottom at about 7.5 ounces of #gold in 2009, having fallen from a record high of just over 40 ounces of gold in 2000. The Dow is now worth just under 14.5 ounces of gold. There’s a good chance that over the next 2 years 100% of the Dow’s gains in gold will be lost.

  • From DrTCJ:

    The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 17.8% in Q2 2020, the largest quarterly gain since Q1 1987 when up 21.5%. The S&P500 was up 20% – best gain since Q4 1998 with the Nasdaq up 31%, top gain since 1999 – all driven by an historic $1.6 trillion government stimulus package

  • From JMichaelWaller:

    9) Court: Defendant Dow Jones argues that since #GuoWengui “is an outspoken figure on matters involving China, he must plead and prove that the WSJ article was published with actual malice, meaning that they had knowledge of its falsity or had serious doubts about its truth…”